What can we learn from Finland?

Jennifer Heath's picture

There is a lot of discussion these days about how to improve our education system -- the conversation is definitely happening here locally, it's going on at the state level, and it's a national concern as well.  I found this recent piece in The Atlantic very interesting because it highlights a different path that has led to educational success in Finland: a focus on giving "every child . . .exactly the same opportunity to learn, regardless of family background, income, or geographic location."   Almost a decade ago, information collected through COMPASS from community residents, the Census, and state/local data sources indicated that education and income disparities were the top issues in the Greater New Haven region.  This disparity affects all of us, even those who see themselves as part of the "better off" group, because as a region, state, and country, our economic competitiveness and success depend on having a well-educated population -- and, as stated in the article, "Finland's experience suggests that to win at that game, a country has to prepare not just some of its population well, but all of its population well, for the new economy. To possess some of the best schools in the world might still not be good enough if there are children being left behind." (emphasis added)  Do we as a community believe this?  What would it take to give all children exactly the same opportunity to learn?  

Comments

Jenna Cluver's picture

To me the crux of it is the tie to the bigger picture of economic inequality. It goes back to what our society believes about distribution of wealth and how much we value equity. If more and more of the "some" or the "better off" portion of our population even struggle to perform at average or to maintain stable employment, how can we offer excellence to all?

As Jennifer said, data shows that regional disparities exist in two primary areas: education and income. As we address these disparities and work to advance the greater (or common) good, can our community agree to define this "good" as access to quality education for all?

Investing ever-increasing resources into innovative education reform will result in a better-prepared population for the future, yes. But are our communities patient and trusting enough to support this approach? Especially when other countries are already ahead of the game? What other choice to we have?

Jenna Cluver's picture

Also, nice to see the article address the Finnish population size/homogeneity and bring it to a state-level comparison...

Deede Dixon's picture

Very interesting, and yes - I like it. My ideal is to come to see equal opportunities regardless of family economic history, and I believe that education is the place to start. I also like the point that if some do not find sufficient opportunities, that can affect the city as a whole. It is time to care about those who are struggling around us.

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.